Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes After Liver Transplantation Depending on the Length of Cold Ischemia Time.

BACKGROUND: Cold ischemia time (CIT) is one of the most significant variables affecting graft survival after liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to identify other predictors of worse graft survival depending on the duration of cold ischemia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included data of liver transplant recipients and donors in the period from 2014 to 2019. A total of 724 patients were analyzed after excluding retransplatations and urgent operations. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we identified CIT value which divides into 2 clinically different subgroups with respect to 5-year graft loss. Within those 2 subgroups, we performed Cox proportional hazard analysis with time to graft loss as endpoint. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off point for CIT was identified as 496 minutes. Model of end-stage liver disease score, recipient body mass index, and donor sodium concentration showed no significant effect on time to graft loss in either subgroup. For 3 factors we observed a significant effect on time to graft loss in subgroup CIT ≥496 min: transfused red cell concentrate units (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.09; P = .02), transfused fresh frozen plasma units (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.08; P = .08), and a recipient age of >60 years (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.10-2.98; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Predictive ability of well-known risk factors for worse outcomes after liver transplantation depend on the length of cold ischemia.

The Effect of Early Retransplantation on Early and Late Survival After Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Early liver retransplantation after liver transplantation (LT) is the ultimate salvage procedure for irreversible graft failure. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of early retransplantation on 90-day and 5-year patient survival. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 2185 patients after LT in the period between 1997 and 2019. First, the patients undergoing first retransplantation within 6 months after initial LT were compared with naïve LT patients for early mortality (within 90 days). Second, to assess late survival, the patients who had retransplantation and survived at least 90 days post LT were compared with naïve LT patients for 5-year overall survival. The patients undergoing late retransplantation (>6 months) were excluded from analyses. Fisher's exact test was used to compare groups for early survival and log-rank test for late survival. RESULTS: The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival was 87.0%, 79.9%, 75.0%, respectively, and did not differ significantly between the groups. The patients undergoing early retransplantation had lower 90-day survival rate of 89.2% as compared to 95.7% for naïve LT patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The early liver retransplantation has profound impact on post-LT 90-day survival; however, patients who survive that period can achieve long overall survival comparable with naïve LT patients.

Early Postoperative Transaminase Activities Affecting Early and Late Liver Graft Survival.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the effect of transaminases' activities in the first posttransplant day on early (90-day) and late (5-year) graft survival. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 612 patients after liver transplantation (LT) in the period between 2015 and 2019. Patients with acute liver failure and with vascular complications after LT were excluded. The natural logarithms of alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) were used for analyses using the logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The optimal cut-off point for transaminases was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. The 5-year graft survival was calculated after previously excluding the patients with 90-day graft loss. RESULTS: The ALT and AST were risk factors for 90-day graft loss (odds ratio 2.16; 95% CI 1.45-3.23; P < .001 and 2.23; 95% CI 1.55-3.19; P < .001, respectively). The optimal cut-off for ALT and AST in prediction of 90-day graft loss was ≥1030 and ≥3899 U/L; area under the curve 0.694 (95% CI 0.602-0.786; P < .001), with 11.3% and 97.1% positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive (NPV) value, and 0.673 (95% CI 0.575-0.772; P < .001), with 18.4% PPV and 95.6% NPV, respectively. The activities of AST and ALT on first posttransplant day were not identified as risk factors for late graft loss (P = .924 and P = .629, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Early post-transplant transaminase activities can be used to determine early liver graft loss; however, their utility is lost for assessing the late graft survival.

The Utility of Early Allograft Dysfunction Components in Determining 90-Day Liver Graft Survival.

BACKGROUND: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) had been established as a useful tool to asses graft and patient survival after liver transplant. We wanted to evaluate effect of EAD components on early graft survival. METHODS: This retrospective study included 264 patients with EAD after liver transplant in the period between 2015 and 2019. The patients with retransplants were excluded from analyses. The EAD was determined with Olthoff criteria. The logistic regression model was used for analyses. The 90-day graft survival was set as a primary outcome measure. RESULTS: The main indications for transplant in the analyzed group were hepatitis C virus infection (53 patients, 20.1%), hepatitis B infection (22, 8.3%), primary sclerosing cholangitis (28, 10.1%), and alcoholic liver disease (62, 23.5%), with a median model for end-stage liver disease score of 13.5 points. The 90-day graft loss occurred in 51 patients (19.3%). Each of the components used in EAD diagnosis was found to be correlated with 90-day graft loss. The bilirubin concentration on day 7 (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4-6.7; P < .001), international normalized ratio on day 7 (OR, 179; 95% CI, 39-815; P < .001), and the natural logarithm of alanine aminotransferase (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6-6.4) and aspartate aminotransferase (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.4-4.9) predicted 90-day graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with EAD, international normalized ratio ≥ 1.6 on day 7 was the strongest predictor of early graft-loss among all EAD components.

Successful Hepatoatrial Anastomosis During a Consecutive Liver Retransplant in the Same Patient Shows Good Long-Term Results: Case Report and 2-Year Follow-Up.

Liver retransplant is the last and only treatment for patients with irreversible graft failure. It is recognized as a high-risk procedure; thus surgical difficulties are multiplied with every successive liver transplant. Liver retransplant is a demanding technical procedure for the surgeon, with no guarantee of postoperative and long-term survival. Here, we report a 29-year-old male patient who underwent a liver transplant in April 2009 due to primary sclerosing cholangitis with overlapping autoimmune hepatitis. The patient underwent liver retransplant in May 2012 due to graft failure. A second liver retransplant was performed in April 2013 using the classical technique. An inflammatory process involving the inferior vena cava and diaphragm forced the surgeon to open the pericardium from the diaphragm and clamp the cuff of the right atrium to perform a hepatoatrial anastomosis of the inferior vena cava. The next steps were performed as for a typical liver transplant. Postoperative stay was free of complications and was not prolonged. Immunosuppression regimen was kept standard. During our follow-up of more than 32 months, the patient continued to show good results. A consecutive hepatectomy in the same recipient is associated with an increased risk of intraoperative complications. When excessive adhesions limit a safe and functioning cavocaval anastomosis, a hepatectomy with the excision of the intrahepatic inferior vena cava and end-to-end anastomosis through a pericardial window for the extension of the recipient's' vena cava cuff are feasible options. We found that a hepatoatrial anastomosis does not impair good overall outcomes and long-term results.

Evolution Of The Results Of 1500 Liver Transplantations Performed In The Department Of General, Transplant And Liver Surgery Medical University Of Warsaw.

UNLABELLED: Liver transplantation is a well-established treatment of patients with end-stage liver disease and selected liver tumors. Remarkable progress has been made over the last years concerning nearly all of its aspects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of long-term outcomes after liver transplantations performed in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery (Medical University of Warsaw). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of 1500 liver transplantations performed between 1989 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Transplantations were divided into 3 groups: group 1 including first 500 operations, group 2 including subsequent 500, and group 3 comprising the most recent 500. Five year overall and graft survival were set as outcome measures. RESULTS: Increased number of transplantations performed at the site was associated with increased age of the recipients (p<0.001) and donors (p<0.001), increased rate of male recipients (p<0.001), and increased rate of piggyback operations (p<0.001), and decreased MELD (p<0.001), as well as decreased blood (p=0.006) and plasma (p<0.001) transfusions. Overall survival was 71.6% at 5 years in group 1, 74.5% at 5 years in group 2, and 85% at 2.9 years in group 3 (p=0.008). Improvement of overall survival was particularly observed for primary transplantations (p=0.004). Increased graft survival rates did not reach the level of significance (p=0.136). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes after liver transplantations performed in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery are comparable to those achieved in the largest transplant centers worldwide and are continuously improving despite increasing recipient age and wider utilization of organs procured from older donors.

Results of liver transplantation in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery at the Medical University of Warsaw in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C viruses infection.

INTRODUCTION: Cirrhosis related to hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most frequent indication for liver transplantation worldwide. Progress in prophylaxis of posttransplant HBV recurrence has led to major improvements in long-term outcomes of patients after liver transplantation. Conversely, impaired posttransplant survival of patients with HCV infection was reported in several studies, mainly due to recurrence of viral infection. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term results of liver transplantation between patients with HBV monoinfection, HCV monoinfection and HBV/HCV coinfection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1090 liver transplantations were performed in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery in cooperation with the Department of Immunology, Internal Medicine, and Transplantology at the Transplantation Institute Medical University of Warsaw between December 1994 and May 2012. After exclusion of patients with cirrhosis of non-viral etiology, patients with malignant tumors, and patients with acute liver failure, the final study cohort comprised 209 patients with HBV (HBV+/HCV- subgroup; n = 56) or HCV (HBV-/HCV+ subgroup; n = 119) monoinfection or HBV/HCV coinfection (HBV+/HCV+; n = 34). These subgroups of patients were compared in terms of long-term results of transplantations, defined by 5-year patient and 5-year graft survival estimates. RESULTS: Overall and graft survival rates after 5-years for the whole study cohort were 74.5% and 72.6%, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 70.4% for patients within the HBV+/HCV- subgroup, 77.8% for patients within the HBV-/HCV+ subgroup, and 68.5% for patients within the HBV+/HCV+ subgroup. The corresponding rates of graft survival were 67.0%, 76.3%, and 68.5% for patients within the HBV+/HCV-, HBV-/ HCV+, and HBV+/HCV+ subgroups, respectively. Observed differences were non-significant, both in terms of overall (p = 0.472) and graft (p = 0.461) survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: Both overall and graft survival rates after liver transplantations performed in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery in cooperation with the Department of Immunology, Internal Medicine, and Transplantology at the Transplantation Institute Medical University of Warsaw in patients with HBV and HCV infection are comparable to those reported by other European and American centers. In contrast to other studies, obtained results do not confirm the negative impact of HCV infection on long-term outcomes of patients.

1000 liver transplantations at the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw--analysis of indications and results.

THE AIM OF THE STUDY: was to analyze indications and results of the first one thousand liver transplantations at Chair and Clinic of General, Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 1000 transplantations (944 patients) performed at Chair and Clinic of General, Transplantation and Liver Surgery between 1994 and 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. These included 943 first transplantations and 55 retransplantations and 2 re-retransplantations. Frequency of particular indications for first transplantation and retransplantations was established. Perioperative mortality was defined as death within 30 days after the transplantation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate 5-year patient and graft survival. RESULTS: The most common indications for first transplantation included: liver failure caused by hepatitis C infection (27.8%) and hepatitis B infection (18%) and alcoholic liver disease (17.7%). Early (< 6 months) and late (> 6 months) retransplantations were dominated by hepatic artery thrombosis (54.3%) and recurrence of the underlying disease (45%). Perioperative mortality rate was 8.9% for first transplantations and 34.5% for retransplantations. Five-year patient and graft survival rate was 74.3% and 71%, respectively, after first transplantations and 54.7% and 52.9%, respectively, after retransplantations. CONCLUSIONS: Development of liver transplantation program provided more than 1000 transplantations and excellent long-term results. Liver failure caused by hepatitis C and B infections remains the most common cause of liver transplantation and structure of other indications is consistent with European data.

Intraoperative injuries during liver resection: analysis of 1,005 procedures.

PURPOSE: Risk of liver resection has been well investigated in many studies. However, the problem of intraoperative injuries is rarely mentioned. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, the type, and management of intraoperative injuries during liver resection. METHODS: A total of 1,005 liver resections between 2004 and 2009 were included in this retrospective investigation. We analyzed the incidence of intraoperative injuries, risk factors, and an impact on patients' clinical outcome. RESULTS: The overall incidence of intraoperative injuries was 4.4% (44 of 1,005). Injuries of the diaphragm (1.6%, 16 of 1,005) and hepatocaval junction (1%, 10 of 1,005) were the most frequent. In multivariate analysis, tumor recurrence (p = 0.0199) and tumor size (p = 0.0317) were the only independent risk factors for diaphragm injuries, whereas the extent of resection (p = 0.0007) was the only independent risk factor for caval or hepatic vein injuries. Injuries of the inferior vena cava or hepatic veins significantly increased perioperative mortality (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Minor injuries causing no significant complications were the most frequent. However, prevention and proper management of the rare injuries of hepatocaval junction are essential to avoid increased mortality in major liver resections.

The occurrence of postreperfusion syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation and its significance in terms of complications and short-term survival.

BACKGROUND: Postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) is a state of significant hemodynamic instability following graft reperfusion during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx). We aimed to investigate its risk factors and influence on patient outcome based on a single centre's experience. MATERIAL/METHODS: A retrospective study on a group of 340 patients undergoing OLTx during the period 2005-2008 was conducted. Piggy-back technique was employed in 266 cases and classical technique in 64. PRS was defined as a decrease in mean arterial pressure greater than 30% below the baseline for a minimum of 1 minute during first 5 minutes of the reperfusion. Logistic regression analysis, Mann-Whitney test and 2-sample proportion test were used. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: PRS occurred in 12.1% of patients. We observed correlations between PRS and the following: longer cold ischemia time, operation with classical technique, longer duration of the operation, higher intraoperative erythrocytal mass (EM) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) requirements, more frequent early post-operative complications, and lower 1-year survival. Retransplantation was needed nearly twice as often in the PRS-group, but the correlation was not statistically significant (the group was very small, as only 8 patients requested re-OLTx). The study did not demonstrate any statistically significant relationship between PRS and donors' age, recipients' age or sex, duration of the hospitalization, and occurrence of complications after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: PRS occurrence seems to be associated with higher mortality rate and worse patient outcome. The study revealed a few risk factors that could be relevant in the prevention of PRS.

Results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LTx) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic liver is nowadays generally accepted treatment modality. AIM OF STUDY: Overview of the indications and results of the LTx in the patients with HCC, the first one performed in 2001. MATERIAL/METHODS: Among 357 adult liver transplant recipients in the period 1994-04.2005, in 26 (7%) the indication was HCC (16 men: 10 women, age 20-65, mean 46.5 years). HCC developed in cirrhotic liver in 25 pts. 12 (48%) were Child C, 10 (30%)--Child B and 3 (12%)--Child A patients. As underlying disease in 2 patients (8%) was alcoholic cirrhosis, in 7 (28%)--HBV cirrhosis, in 12 (48%)--HCV cirrhosis and in 4 (16%)--HBV/HCV cirrhosis. Milano criteria were met in 20 patients (77%). The mean waiting list time was 2.9 months (range 1-6 months). Seven patients underwent liver resection and 1 transarterial chemoembolization prior to LTx. 11 patients (42%) were operated on with use of veno-venous bypass, in 15 patients (58%) the piggy back technique was applied. Rapamycine based immunosuppression was preferred in post-LTx treatment. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 0.4 patients required relaparotomy for intraperitoneal bleeding. 21 patients (81%) are alive in good general condition, 19--free of the disease. 5 patients died 7-28 months after LTx (mean 16.7). The mean survival time is 20 months (range 1-38). CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation is safe and effective method of treatment of the selected patients with HCC in cirrhotic liver. Further investigations concerning the precise indications, timing of the transplantation and adjuvant treatment are necessary.

Surgical and interventional radiological treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome: report of nine cases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The authors present the methods and results of treatment of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome. METHODOLOGY: From a group of 15 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, treated in our department from January 1996 to September 2001, nine patients (6 females and 3 males, aged from 23 to 45 years) were qualified for surgical or radiological treatment. In 3 of them the hepatic vein thrombosis resulted from untreated polycythemia. In the remaining 6 cases the etiology of thrombosis remained unknown. In four patients with dominating portal hypertension symptoms, a meso-caval H-type graft was created. Four patients with severe liver insufficiency were qualified for orthotopic liver transplantation; all of them were transplanted. In 1 patient a balloon dilatation of the right and middle hepatic veins orifices was performed during the diagnostic cavography. The follow-up period ranged from 4 months to 5 years. RESULTS: In 2 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome of unknown etiology, the "H"-shunt remained patent, and the patients were free of ascites and splenomegaly. During the period of follow-up (more than 5 years) they remained free of symptoms and demonstrated acceptable liver function parameters. Doppler sonography revealed the partial recanalization of the venous system. In 2 polycythemic patients, the shunt thrombosed, which was the indication for orthotopic liver transplantation in one of them. The transplantation was performed, but was unsuccessful because of hepatic graft artery thrombosis. The retransplantation in this case was also unsuccessful. The remaining 3 patients transplanted for cryptogenic Budd-Chiari syndrome are alive and well, 4, 5 and 11 months after orthotopic liver transplantation. In the patient subjected to interventional radiological hepatic veins dilation, the vessels remain patent 26 months post-procedure. The patient is free from ascites. CONCLUSIONS: Shunt surgery and liver transplantation are the valuable methods of treatment in selected cases of Budd-Chiari syndrome. In patients with polycythemia, however, thrombotic complications may occur in spite of anticoagulant and chemotherapeutic treatment. Balloon dilatation may appear an alternative to surgical treatment, but it seems that its indications should be limited to a highly selected group of patients.